The assessor placed the building on the tangible account by classifying it as “Construction in Progress”, despite the building being more than 95% complete with partial occupancy prior to the
end of the year. In doing so, the assessor hoped to generate $1.1M dollars in property tax revenue on the personal property account; the real improvements were exempt from city and county taxes under a negotiated 10-year PILOT agreement with an equity firm.
PVS appealed and represented the taxpayer at hearing, arguing that the hospital building was
“substantially complete” as of January 1, and was therefore classified as real property.